At every stage of the usability engineering process, we help you secure your medical device, strengthen your MDR 2017/745 and IVDR 2017/746 files, and design interfaces built for real users.


Leveraging our expertise in human factors, ergonomics and regulatory affairs, we help you design and evaluate medical devices that are safe, intuitive and compliant with safety standards.

Discovering a use problem at the end of development means emergency changes to your device. The result: months of delay and a budget that explodes (up to 10 times more expensive than an anticipated change!*).
Between 2010 and 2012, 36% of FDA medical device recalls were due to interface or design issues*. Errors that could have been avoided from the start of development.
A non-intuitive device that doesn't meet user needs will be rejected. Between loss of trust, dissatisfied customers and poor reputation, the impact can be severe.
Non-compliance on the file, summative evaluation to redo, last-minute corrections… Without a clear method, certification becomes an obstacle course.
IEC 62366-1, TR 62366-2, ISO 11607, HF guidance… These standards accumulate and quickly become a headache for your teams already busy with development.
Our user studies quickly detect ergonomic issues and associated use errors, preventing costly changes at the end of the project.
By anticipating use risks and integrating real user needs, we strengthen the safety of your devices.
An intuitive, user-centred interface drives adoption and satisfaction from day one on the market.
We build a solid usability/human factors engineering file, meeting CE/FDA expectations, so you get your certifications faster.
With more than 10 years of combined experience, we master user research, design and usability standards to guide you at every step.
We support you through the complete usability engineering process for your medical device, ensuring compliance with CE and FDA requirements while enabling an intuitive and safe user experience.

You have an internal team but want expert support at every stage?
You do it, we guide you.
You need a reliable partner to handle one or all stages of your project?
We take care of everything.
We handle certain key stages and support you on others.
A hybrid and flexible format.
From Class I to Class III for MDR 2017/745, from A to D for IVDR 2017/746, as well as other health and innovation products, regulated or not. Whether it's a physical product, software, a medicine or accompanying documentation, we adapt our expertise to your needs.
MD, implantable medical device
Digital medical device (SaMD), digital interface
Medicine, package insert & drug delivery device
IVD
Package insert, IFU, quick start guide, illustrations
Presentation, eLearning
Amandine Broussier is a reliable, competent partner who guided us throughout our usability process. When we had questions about interpreting the standard and improving our products, Amandine gave us excellent advice. She is also a person of great human quality who knows how to build trust with testers and collaborators.

Design Validation vs. Human Factors Validation: what are the differences?
Read article
The Usability Engineering Report (UER): what is it, how to write it and what are the differences between CE marking and FDA clearance?
Read article
Package insert readability studies: a key step for Marketing Authorization (MA)
Read articleLearn more about usability engineering and IEC 62366, in under a minute or in depth.
Watch our videosListen to our experts and guests share their experience and practical advice for designing safe, intuitive and compliant medical devices.
Listen to our podcastEvery month, receive the latest regulatory updates in usability engineering and ergonomics, our tips and best practices, plus guides and tools to stay current and save time on your projects.
Write to us and we'll take the time to guide you and show you how to secure and improve your product.
Contact an expert